ONLINE
DISPUTE RESOLUTION
By K P C Rao.,
LLB., FCS., FICWA
kpcrao.india@gmail.com
“Let us not negotiate with fear but let us
not fear to negotiate”.
John
F. Kennedy, former US President
Globalization has been a great stimulation in the
process of integration of economies and societies of different countries across
the globe. It has been a great tool for breaking economic barrier and
envisioning world as a market for trade. In the modern techniques of dispute
resolution of commercial conflicts, emphasis has drifted from litigation to
arbitration. As things are never static,
emphasis is further sliding from arbitration
to alternate dispute resolution procedures.
Mediation or conciliation is one of the most important procedures of ADR
(Alternate Dispute Resolution).
Regulation of arbitration laws by conciliation or mediation is a novelty of the
modern arbitration law. The drift from arbitration towards conciliation started
with the appearance of conciliation legislation, which of late has been increasingly
attracting the attention of the international business community. Conciliation
may play a pivotal role, particularly in settling commercial disputes. It is more economic convenient, speedy, and
less formal mode of dispute resolution.
Pendency of cases in
courts across the country has turned out to be a "gigantic problem"
with about three crore cases waiting for redressal and the undue delay making
people to shy away from justice delivery system. Despite an increased disposal
rate of cases, the apex court failed to reduce the pendency as it could not
cope with the rising number of cases filed every year. A similar trend was seen
at the level of high courts and trial courts. The huge backlog of cases and the
interminable delays in adjudication of cases has come to assume critical
proportions in Indian Judicial System. Apart from an infrastructural mismatch,
the lower judge strength of around 10.5 per a million population is broadly considered
an endemic cause for this problem.
Online dispute resolution (ODR) is a branch of dispute resolution which uses technology to
facilitate the resolution of disputes between parties. It primarily involves negotiation, mediation or arbitration, or a
combination of all three. Online dispute resolution (“ODR”) is conceived as a
means to achieve some of the most powerful legal ideals of the Western legal
tradition, which include :
(1) Legal
Certainty:
In making individual plans,
decisions, and choices everyone is entitled to know what the law is in advance.
(2) Access to
Justice:
Everyone involved in a dispute
shall be entitled to an easily accessible redress mechanism that provides for a
timely resolution and effective remedies at reasonable cost.
ODR is concerned with the civilized
(i.e. peaceful) resolution of disputes between private parties, and, secondly,
with the prevention of such conflicts through the provision of legal certainty.
National legal systems fulfill the former function by offering plaintiffs to
litigate disputes before state courts which exercise mandatory jurisdiction
over defendants, and the latter by making the litigation process public, thus
allowing for the proliferation of precedent, as well as by the enactment of
codifications of rules of law.
Regarding the dispute resolution
function of private law, there are a variety of functional equivalents to
litigation available, which are collectively referred to as alternative dispute
resolution (ADR). On the one hand ODR relates to the resolution of disputes
that result from online conduct, i.e. from communications and transactions
which come about through the use of the Internet Domain name disputes are a
prominent example as are disputes related to e-commerce. On the other hand, ODR
relates to the use of online communication technology in the resolution process,
even if the dispute itself has an offline origin. The provision of alternative
dispute resolution (ADR) services on the Internet has become quite popular. Online
dispute resolution (ODR) in India is in its infancy stage and it is gaining
prominence day by day. With the enactment of Information Technology Act,
2000, e-commerce and e-governance have been given a formal and legal
recognition.
Human beings, when it comes to disputes relating to money or status, are all the same, everywhere round the globe. Selfishness, strength of money-power for protracting litigation or ego are common features. If the conciliation /mediation solutions have been successful in other countries, they must and will succeed here also. Where the problems are same, the solutions could be similar, though there may be differences in degree or the methodology adopted. The procedure for conciliation/mediation are today part of the systems of almost every judicial administration both in common law countries as well as in countries governed by civil law systems. The fact that we have woken up in 1999 and have started to enforce sec. 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure only from 1st July 2002, should not matter. Better late than never. It is vital that every Bar council, every Bar Association and every lawyer to give conciliation/mediation higher priority than adjudication and give the litigant a reasonably good chance of settling the disputes so as to save time, money-leaving more complicated and tougher cases and the criminal cases to pass through the adjudicatory process.
[Published in Circuit, Monthly magazine of ICAI, Hyderabad
and
Corporate Secretary, Monthly magazine of ICSI, Hyderabad]
No comments:
Post a Comment